Helping you achieve academic success
I am an experienced academic passionate about inspiring individuals to aim high. I have assisted multiple students and early career academics to achieve their goals.
A comprehensive literature review is often essential for any dissertation or research project. However, many students struggle with the literature review due to lack of experience with writing one before they get to their final year project.
A literature review is NOT AN ESSAY! I’ve lost count of how many students have tried to write their literature review as if it’s an essay. The only similarity between a literature review and an essay is that both contain an introduction, middle and conclusion. Other than that, they are completely different!
Please note that some dissertations/research projects may just be a long literature review. In this case you may need to think about how to theme your chapters/sections. What we are focusing on here is a literature review that is part of a research study.
It’s also worth noting that there is a huge difference between a narrative literature review, which is what we are discussing here, and a systematic review. A systematic review is a research study in itself and you can read more about those here.
The goal of a narrative literature review is to tell the back story leading up to your project. Throughout the literature review it is very important to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the key theories, concepts and terminology relating to your topic. By the end of your literature review the reader needs to have answers to the following questions:
A literature review is NOT just a list of sources that are simply described one after the other. It must be written critically and identify the shortcomings of previous research on your topic. It’s worth remembering throughout that the main aim is to provide a convincing case for the need for your study. For this reason, it’s good to think about the literature review as a story:
There are a few different options when it comes to structuring the main body or middle section of your literature review so that it tells a logical and coherent story. These can either be used on their own or in combination with one another:
It’s usual to think of each of your paragraphs like a mini essay. I always suggest using the WEED model for writing clear paragraphs in the literature review. This also works for other kinds of academic writing, but I think it works particularly well for a literature review:
Here’s an example of a paragraph based on the WEED model:
By its very nature, motivation requires a degree of individual satisfaction or narcissism. Robbins et al (1998) suggest that motivation has as its basis the need to focus on, and please the self. This is supported by Shaw, Shapard and Waugaman (2000) who contend that this narcissistic drive is based upon the human effort to find personal significance in life. It can be argued that the desire to improve one’s status is a highly motivational force, and is central to the idea of narcissistic motivation. The narcissistic motivational strategies put forward by Shaw et al (2000) are concerned with motivation for life in general, but may also have applications in the context of work. These strategies, with their focus on personal needs, demonstrate that narcissism is an essential component of motivation
Whilst the example paragraph above is good, it could be improved by the use of further citations. This can be achieved by grouping studies together and listing them in brackets like this: (Georgini & Nathanaelos 2024; Sittingbourne, 2020; Tabs and Gabb, 2022). Grouping studies like this is useful for three reasons:
Get help from Gibbons Academic with your literature review NOW by booking an online session or sending your draft work for review and detailed written or verbal feedback with suggestions for improvement from an expert.